In this role, Jon is accountable for the development, implementation, and sustainment of operations excellence and customer service strategies within Starbucks Asia Pacific. He is also responsible for operationalizing product and design innovations in Starbucks stores across the region.
Reflections on Violence, Law, and Humanitarianism Talal Asad Charles Taylor, one of the most influential living philosophers in the English-speaking world, has inspired many social scientists, including anthropologists. In his remarkable work Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity he traces the sensibilities that are central to the modern individual and argues that they have Christian especially Protestant roots.
Prominent among them is the virtue of universal benevolence that is closely connected with a new concern with psychological interiority: This is not just a sensitivity to suffering, a greater squeamishness about inflicting it or witnessing it.
It is true that this undoubtedly has occurred, as we can see it in a host of ways, especially in the softening of penal codes which the Enlightenment helped bring about, partly under the influence of Beccaria and Bentham.
But beyond this, we feel called upon to relieve suffering, to put an end to it. But harvard law independent writing activities very critique supposes certain standards of universal concern.
It is these that are deeply anchored in our moral culture. The assumption in narratives about the elimination of human suffering is that moral progress is advanced when the violence of military conflict and dictatorial repression gives way to the nonviolence of international diplomacy and democratic politics, when harsh physical punishment of convicts gives way to humane confinement, when war gives way to peace.
They are diverse in the sense that they may evince horror at what they see or remorse at what they have done; they may express a feeling of inadequacy at the thought that they are unable to prevent some terrible suffering or of complacency at supporting a virtuous cause from a position of security.
They are complicated because they may articulate pleasure or gratification at the cruel punishment of people they have learnt to fear and hate and despise, or several emotions may contend in the same person.
I simply stress the need to enquire into how people react to that standard, how they employ it, and what emotions help constitute it.
But before I try to do this I want to bring out briefly some contradictions in our understanding and practice of benevolence. Thus the modern state is seen not only as the crowning achievement of liberal democracy but also as the basis of a wealthy civilization founded on capitalism in which general concern for human well-being can flourish.
This is consistent with a widespread belief that, since the end of the eighteenth century, peoples in Euro-America have become increasingly free and humane because freedom and humanity naturally reinforce each other. But the conditions of benevolence are more complicated than this story would suggest.
Take the modern US prison system, for instance. What are we to make of the fact that US correctional system, with all its cruelty, contains a far higher proportion of prisoners to the total US population than it ever did before?
The legal historian James Whitman has, however, a provocatively different view: It is precisely the political culture of liberal democracy, he declares, by which this modern statist form of violence is to be explained. The answer, perhaps, is that the major objects of punitive violence in that period were slaves and Indians, two classes of people who were regarded not only as a danger to settler freedom but also as an obstacle to the growth and flourishing of civilization itself.
So my point here is not the banal one that Enlightenment thinkers did not overlook emotion in favor of reason we know that many of them wrote at length about the centrality of emotion to social life ; it is that many of them had a more subtle view of sympathy than some modern humanitarians have.
In what follows, I want to explore humanitarianism that uses violence to subdue violence and some of the paradoxical ways it is played out emotionally and conceptualized in modern law and morality.
Why is modern morality most evident in expressions of aversion rather than approval? How, precisely, do benevolence and empathy that moderns should cultivate combine with cruelty and violence that moderns should avoid?Harvard Summer School complies with the following federal and state guidelines.
Pericles ABLE Project is a non-profit American run learning center, established in Russia. Pericles specializes in preparing foreign students to work or study in Western businesses or Law . Harvard Referencing Guide. Harvard is a referencing style which is used widely across a range of disciplines; it could arguably be deemed the "most commonly used" style.
The Online Writing Lab (OWL) at Purdue University houses writing resources and instructional material, and we provide these as a free service of the Writing Lab at Purdue. The Harvard Law School Program on International Law and Armed Conflict (HLS PILAC) is a new research program.
Drawing on its world-class faculty and its extraordinary students, PILAC provides a space for research on critical challenges facing the various fields of public international law related to armed conflict — including the jus ad bellum, the jus in bello (international humanitarian.
The full guide has two sections. In the first part we show you how to cite a reference in the text of your assignment, in the second part we have included instructions for each of the main source types such as books or web pages.